4.7 Article

Multispectral image analysis approach to detect adulteration of beef and pork in raw meats

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 67, 期 -, 页码 12-18

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.10.032

关键词

Meat adulteration; Multispectral image analysis; Discriminant Analysis; Minced beef/pork; External validation

资金

  1. Intelligent multi-sensor system for meat analysis -iMeatSense 550
  2. European Union (European Social Fund - ESF)
  3. Greek national funds through the Operational Program Education and Lifelong Learning of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) Research Funding Program: ARISTEIA-I

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of multispectral imaging supported by multivariate data analysis for the detection of minced beef fraudulently substituted with pork and vice versa. Multispectral images in 18 different wavelengths of 220 meat samples in total from four independent experiments (55 samples per experiment) were acquired for this work. The appropriate amount of beef and pork-minced meat was mixed in order to achieve nine different proportions of adulteration and two categories of pure pork and beef. After an image processing step, data from the first three experiments were used for partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) so as to discriminate among all adulteration classes, as well as among adulterated, pure beef and pure pork samples. Results showed very good discrimination between pure and adulterated samples, for PLS-DA and LDA, yielding 98.48% overall correct classification. Additionally, 98.48% and 96.97% of the samples were classified within a +/- 10% category of adulteration for LDA and PLS-DA respectively. Lastly, the models were further validated using the data of the fourth experiment for independent testing, where all pure and adulterated samples were classified correctly in the case of PLS-DA, while LDA was proved to be less accurate. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据