4.7 Article

Impact of the industrial freezing process on selected vegetables -Part II. Colour and bioactive compounds

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 89-97

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.05.036

关键词

Asparagus; Green beans; Zucchini; Vitamin C; Chlorophylls; Polyphenols; Lutein

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In the present study, the impact of the different steps (i.e. blanching, freezing, storage following the industrial freezing process and the final cooking prior to consumption) of the industrial freezing process was evaluated on colour, chlorophylls, lutein, polyphenols and ascorbic acid content of asparagus, green beans and zucchini. In addition, the domestic boiling of raw samples was compared with the boiling of frozen storage vegetables. Results showed that the blanching treatment retained phytochemicals in all studied green vegetables and the frozen storage up to 2 months did not negatively affected phytochemicals, in particular lutein and flavonoids in almost all samples. On the contrary, colour significantly changed during blanching and frozen storage. The changes of b* (yellowness) and the shift of H degrees (hue angle) were not coherent with the increase of pheophytin. In addition, the greenness (-a*) was found to increase with the exception of boiled samples in all vegetables. Generally, in boiled frozen vegetables there was a better or comparable retention of bioactive compounds with respect to raw ones, and this was especially true for green beans and zucchini. Colour changes after cooking did not exhibit the same trends among vegetables, being more remarkable for frozen asparagus in comparison with those boiled from raw, but overall comparable for green beans and zucchini. In conclusion, the overall results of the present study suggest that, when the industrial freezing process is well performed, the boiled frozen vegetables do not have a lower nutritional value than the fresh ones. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据