4.7 Article

Unified Vision-Based Methodology for Simultaneous Concrete Defect Detection and Geolocalization

Vision-based autonomous inspection of concrete surface defects is crucial for efficient maintenance and rehabilitation of infrastructures and has become a research hot spot. However, most existing vision-based inspection methods mainly focus on detecting one kind of defect in nearly uniform testing background where defects are relatively large and easily recognizable. But in the real-world scenarios, multiple types of defects often occur simultaneously. And most of them occupy only small fractions of inspection images and are swamped in cluttered background, which easily leads to missed and false detections. In addition, the majority of the previous researches only focus on detecting defects but few of them pay attention to the geolocalization problem, which is indispensable for timely performing repair, protection, or reinforcement works. And most of them rely heavily on GPS for tracking the locations of the defects. However, this method is sometimes unreliable within infrastructures where the GPS signals are easily blocked, which causes a dramatic increase in searching costs. To address these limitations, we present a unified and purely vision-based method denoted as defects detection and localization network, which can detect and classify various typical types of defects under challenging conditions while simultaneously geolocating the defects without requiring external localization sensors. We design a supervised deep convolutional neural network and propose novel training methods to optimize its performance on specific tasks. Extensive experiments show that the proposed method is effective with a detection accuracy of 80.7% and a localization accuracy of 86% at 0.41 s per image (at a scale of 1,200 pixels in the field test experiment), which is ideal for integration within intelligent autonomous inspection systems to provide support for practical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据