4.7 Review

Food byproducts as amendments in trace elements contaminated soils

期刊

FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 73, 期 -, 页码 176-189

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2015.03.040

关键词

Heavy metals; Metalloids; Soil remediation; Sugar beet lime; Olive mill waste; Agri-food waste recycling

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN)
  2. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO)
  3. EU (FEDER funds)
  4. Fundacion Seneca (Murcia Region) [CFM2010-21922-C02-01, AGL2011-23617, CTM2013-48697-C2-1-R, 11785/PI/09]
  5. European Social Fund of the EU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Trace elements stabilization in contaminated soils is frequently the most convenient option for the remediation of large areas with moderate to high levels of contaminants. The use of organic and/or inorganic amendments is often necessary for the amelioration of the soil in order to immobilize trace metals and metalloids and prevent their transfer to groundwater or to any living organism in the soil, and to allow the establishment of plants when the aim is the regeneration of a vegetation cover. The great upsurge of the agri-food industry in recent decades has led to the generation of huge amounts of waste materials and byproducts throughout the entire cycle of food production and processing. Some of these byproducts, which may give rise to serious environmental concerns regarding their accumulation, handling and transformation, have been satisfactorily used as amendments in the remediation of trace elements contaminated soils. This review offers a general outline of the use of food byproducts from olive oil, sugar beet, wine, and certain other industries for the stabilization of trace metals and metalloids in the soil. Both the benefits of using these materials and the potential limitations or inconveniences that their utilization may pose, as well as some considerations regarding possible future uses and challenges, are pointed out in the text. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据