4.7 Article

Retinal artery/vein classification using genetic-search feature selection

期刊

COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE
卷 161, 期 -, 页码 197-207

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.04.016

关键词

Fundus image; Artery/vein classification; Genetic search feature selection

资金

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [629.001.003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and objectives: The automatic classification of retinal blood vessels into artery and vein (A/V) is still a challenging task in retinal image analysis. Recent works on A/V classification mainly focus on the graph analysis of the retinal vasculature, which exploits the connectivity of vessels to improve the classification performance. While they have overlooked the importance of pixel-wise classification to the final classification results. This paper shows that a complicated feature set is efficient for vessel centerline pixels classification. Methods: We extract enormous amount of features for vessel centerline pixels, and apply a genetic-search based feature selection technique to obtain the optimal feature subset for A/V classification. Results: The proposed method achieves an accuracy of 90.2%, the sensitivity of 89.6%, the specificity of 91.3% on the INSPIRE dataset. It shows that our method, using only the information of centerline pixels, gives a comparable performance as the techniques which use complicated graph analysis. In addition, the results on the images acquired by different fundus cameras show that our framework is capable for discriminating vessels independent of the imaging device characteristics, image resolution and image quality. Conclusion: The complicated feature set is essential for A/V classification, especially on the individual vessels where graph-based methods receive limitations. And it could provide a higher entry to the graph-analysis to achieve a better A/V labeling. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据