4.5 Article

Semiparametric regression analysis of clustered survival data with semi-competing risks

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS
卷 124, 期 -, 页码 53-70

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2018.02.003

关键词

Copula; Clustered data; Monte Carlo EM algorithm; Proportional hazards model; Random effects; Semi-competing risks

资金

  1. Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 2 Grant [MOE2013-T2-2-118]
  2. Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 1 Grant [RG30/12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Analysis of semi-competing risks data is becoming increasingly important in medical research in which a subject may experience both nonterminal and terminal events, and the time to the intermediate nonterminal event (e.g. onset of a disease) is subject to dependent censoring by the terminal event (e.g. death) but not vice versa. Typically, both two types of events are dependent. In many applications, subjects may also be nested within clusters, such as patients in a multi-center study, leading to possible association among event times due to unobserved shared factors across subjects. To incorporate dependency within clusters and association between two types of event times, we propose a new flexible semiparametric modeling framework where a copula model is employed for the joint distribution of the nonterminal and terminal events, and their marginal distributions are modeled by Cox proportional hazards models with random effects. A nonparametric maximum likelihood estimation procedure is developed and implemented through a Monte Carlo EM algorithm. The proposed estimator is also shown to enjoy desirable asymptotic properties. Results from extensive simulation studies indicate that the proposed method performs very well in finite samples and is especially robust against misspecification of the random effects distribution. We further illustrate the practical utility of the method by analyzing data from a multi-institutional study of breast cancer. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据