4.7 Article

An uncertainty model of acoustic metamaterials with random parameters

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL MECHANICS
卷 62, 期 5, 页码 1023-1036

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00466-018-1548-y

关键词

Acoustic metamaterials; Random parameters; Perturbation stochastic finite element method; Change-of-variable technique; Probability density function

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51322502]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
  3. Research Project of State Key Laboratory of Structural Analysis for Industrial Equipment [GZ1403]
  4. Science Fund of State Key Laboratory of Advanced Design and Manufacturing for Vehicle Body [51375001]
  5. Research Project of State Key Laboratory of Mechanical Systems and Vibration [MSV201613]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acoustic metamaterials (AMs) are man-made composite materials. However, the random uncertainties are unavoidable in the application of AMs due to manufacturing and material errors which lead to the variance of the physical responses of AMs. In this paper, an uncertainty model based on the change of variable perturbation stochastic finite element method (CVPS-FEM) is formulated to predict the probability density functions of physical responses of AMs with random parameters. Three types of physical responses including the band structure, mode shapes and frequency response function of AMs are studied in the uncertainty model, which is of great interest in the design of AMs. In this computation, the physical responses of stochastic AMs are expressed as linear functions of the pre-defined random parameters by using the first-order Taylor series expansion and perturbation technique. Then, based on the linear function relationships of parameters and responses, the probability density functions of the responses can be calculated by the change-of-variable technique. Three numerical examples are employed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the CVPS-FEM for stochastic AMs, and the results are validated by Monte Carlo method successfully.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据