4.5 Article

Connecting interatomic potential characteristics with deformation response in FCC materials

期刊

COMPUTATIONAL MATERIALS SCIENCE
卷 147, 期 -, 页码 18-27

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.01.055

关键词

Molecular dynamics; Interatomic potentials; Mechanical behavior; Stacking fault energy; Grain boundaries; FCC materials

资金

  1. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-FG02-08ER46525]
  2. National Science Foundation, DMR award [1507846]
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1507846] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present a molecular dynamics study using six different FCC model embedded atom method interatomic potentials. We investigate the relationship between specific interatomic force law properties and the deformation response of nano-scale grain boundary networks. We used a fully periodic quasi three-dimensional sample with random [1 1 0] tilt boundaries, adjusted for the lattice parameter of each potential. This procedure enabled the study of deformation behavior differences to be attributed to the potential used. The interatomic potential characteristics of cohesive energy, elastic constants and stable and unstable stacking fault energies were correlated with grain boundary structure and energy, the yield and flow stress, and the contributions to plasticity from dislocation emission and grain boundary sliding. We find non-planar features in the grain boundary structure for interatomic potentials characterized by low stacking fault energy. In turn, these non-planar features in the grain boundary hinder grain boundary sliding deformation mechanisms. Dislocation emission from the grain boundaries is controlled by the unstable stacking fault energy. The overall yield and flow stresses observed for these nano-scale grain boundary networks correlate with the unstable stacking fault energy given by the potential. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据