4.2 Article

A Novel Model for Predicting Associations between Diseases and LncRNA-miRNA Pairs Based on a Newly Constructed Bipartite Network

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2018/6789089

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province [2018JJ4058, 2017JJ5036]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61640210, 61672447]
  3. CERNET Next Generation Internet Technology Innovation Project [NGII20160305]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Motivation. Increasing studies have demonstrated that many human complex diseases are associated with not only microRNAs, but also long-noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). LncRNAs and microRNA play significant roles in various biological processes. Therefore, developing effective computational models for predicting novel associations between diseases and lncRNA-miRNA pairs (LMPairs) will be beneficial to not only the understanding of disease mechanisms at lncRNA-miRNA level and the detection of disease biomarkers for disease diagnosis, treatment, prognosis, and prevention, but also the understanding of interactions between diseases and LMPairs at disease level. Results. It is well known that genes with similar functions are often associated with similar diseases. In this article, a novel model named PADLMP for predicting associations between diseases and LMPairs is proposed. In this model, a Disease-LncRNA-miRNA (DLM) tripartite network was designed firstly by integrating the lncRNA-disease association network and miRNA-disease association network; then we constructed the disease-LMPairs bipartite association network based on the DLM network and lncRNA-miRNA association network; finally, we predicted potential associations between diseases and LMPairs based on the newly constructed disease-LMPair network. Simulation results show that PADLMP can achieve AUCs of 0.9318, 0.9090 +/- 0.0264, and 0.8950 +/- 0.0027 in the LOOCV, 2-fold, and 5-fold cross validation framework, respectively, which demonstrate the reliable prediction performance of PADLMP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据