4.7 Article

DIRECT IMAGING OF AN ASYMMETRIC DEBRIS DISK IN THE HD 106906 PLANETARY SYSTEM

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 814, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/814/1/32

关键词

circumstellar matter; infrared: stars; stars: individual (HD 106906); techniques: high angular resolution

资金

  1. NASA [NNX15AD95G, NNX14AJ80G, NNX11AD21G]
  2. NSF [AST-0909188, AST-1411868, AST-1413718]
  3. University of California [LFRP-118057]
  4. NASA's Science Mission Directorate
  5. NASA [149089, NNX11AD21G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  6. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1518332, 1411868, 1413718] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present the first scattered light detections of the HD 106906 debris disk using the Gemini/Gemini Planet Imager in the infrared and Hubble Space Telescope (HST)/Advanced Camera for Surveys in the optical. HD 106906 is a 13 Myr old F5V star in the Sco-Cen association, with a previously detected planet-mass candidate HD 106906b projected 650 AU from the host star. Our observations reveal a near edge-on debris disk that has a central cleared region with radius similar to 50 AU, and an outer extent >500 AU. The HST data show that the outer regions are highly asymmetric, resembling the needle morphology seen for the HD 15115 debris disk. The planet candidate is oriented similar to 21 degrees away from the position angle of the primary's debris disk, strongly suggesting non-coplanarity with the system. We hypothesize that HD 106906b could be dynamically involved in the perturbation of the primary's disk, and investigate whether or not there is evidence for a circumplanetary dust disk or cloud that is either primordial or captured from the primary We show that both the existing optical properties and near-infrared colors of HD 106906b are weakly consistent with this possibility, motivating future work to test for the observational signatures of dust surrounding the planet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据