4.7 Article

A multiscale damage analysis of periodic composites using a couple-stress/Cauchy multidomain model: Application to masonry structures

期刊

COMPOSITES PART B-ENGINEERING
卷 141, 期 -, 页码 50-59

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.025

关键词

Couple-stress continua; Multiscale methods; Masonry; Homogenization; Damage; Composite structures

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Research (P.R.I.N. National Grant) [B86J16002300001]
  2. Italian Ministry of University and Research (Sapienza Research Unit)
  3. Italian Ministry of University and Research (Calabria Research Unit)
  4. Sapienza University [B82F16005920005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel multiscale strategy is proposed for the damage analysis of masonry structures modeled as periodic composites. Such a computational strategy, whose aim is to reduce the typically high computational cost exhibited by fully microscopic numerical analyses, is based on a multiscale/multidomain model equipped with an adaptive capability, which allows to automatically zoom-in the zones incipiently affected by damage onset. The associated model refinement criterion requires the determination of microscopically informed first failure surfaces, which take into account both classical and bending deformation effects, by taking advantage of a couple-stress based homogenization technique. In order to assess the efficacy of the proposed multiscale modeling strategy, some numerical simulations are presented, involving a medium-sized wall test subjected to combined shear and flexure loading conditions. The related accuracy and computational performances of this methodology are investigated via suitable comparisons with a purely discrete model of masonry. Special attention is devoted to the analysis of the bending macroscopic deformation effects. Further comparisons with experimental results taken from the literature are carried out in order to validate its predictive capability in terms of peak and post-peak mechanical behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据