4.7 Article

Three-dimensional hygrothermal vibration of multilayered cylindrical shells

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 201, 期 -, 页码 867-881

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.055

关键词

Vibration; Multilayered cylindrical shells; Hygrothermal environment; Spectral-sampling surface method; General boundary condition

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51709066, 51775125]
  2. China's Post-doctoral Science Fund [2017M621252]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [HEUCFG201713]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rise in moisture concentration and temperature reduces both strength and stiffness of composites. A thorough understanding of the effects of temperature and moisture concentration in composite structures is critical in ensuring safety design. There seems to be no such solutions available for multilayered composite cylindrical shells. This paper is therefore devoted to the three-dimensional hygrothermal vibration analysis of multilayered cylindrical shells under general boundary conditions for the first time. The formulation is based on the 3-D elasticity theory. The vibrational displacement field is numerically discretized by the sampling surface technique in the transfer domain and approximated by the spectral method in the remaining domains. The transverse deformations and interlaminate continuities are taken into account in combination with differential-quadrature concept. The governing equations are finally derived in a modified variational form for constrained system and the boundary conditions are taken into account in a unified form by utilizing penalty functions and Lagrange multipliers. The boundary conditions may be free, simply-supported, clamped or/and elastically restrained. The solutions match well with those reported in the literature in verification. The effects of hygrothermal environment boundary conditions, shell geometry, lamination are brought out and discussed through parametric study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据