4.7 Article

Reliability-based design optimization of composite battery box based on modified particle swarm optimization algorithm

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 204, 期 -, 页码 239-255

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.053

关键词

Composite battery box; Multiscale reliability-based design optimization; Finite element simulation; Particle swarm optimization; Kriging surrogate model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11772191, 51705312]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M61156]
  3. Shanghai Jiao Tong University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The application of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) material introduces great challenges to the optimization design process, such as complex non-linear material behavior, the inherent uncertainty of design variables and multilevel characteristics of the structure. This paper aims at developing a reliability-based design optimization (RBDO) method to solve the CFRP battery box lightweight design problem considering both meso- and macro-scopic parameters. The method has three kernel parts: the uncertainty quantification and propagation part, the finite element analysis part and the optimization part. In the first part, the internal geometry variability of plain woven CFRP was obtained by X-ray micro-CT images. Representative Volume Element (RVE) models are established to predict the elastic and strength properties of the studied composites, and the constitutive model of material was adapted in stiffness and strength analysis of the battery box structure in the second part. Then a RBDO procedure considering design variables across two scales is developed using a modified particle swarm optimization and surrogate modeling techniques. The structure of the CFRP battery box achieved by the proposed multiscale optimization procedure realizes a weight loss of 22.14%, and the performance demands are satisfied with high reliability, which further reveals the advantages of using this methodology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据