4.7 Article

Cleaning and sanitation of Salmonella-contaminated peanut butter processing equipment

期刊

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
卷 46, 期 -, 页码 100-106

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2014.03.003

关键词

Peanut butter; Salmonella; Sanitation

资金

  1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration
  2. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Office of the Commissioner, Commissioner's Fellowship Program (CFP)
  3. International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) North America

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microbial contamination of peanut butter by Salmonella poses a significant health risk as Salmonella may remain viable throughout the product shelf life. Effective cleaning and sanitation of processing lines are essential for preventing cross-contamination. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a cleaning and sanitation procedure involving hot oil and 60% isopropanol, +/- quaternary ammonium compounds, to decontaminate pilot-scale processing equipment harboring Salmonella. Peanut butter inoculated with a cocktail of four Salmonella serovars (similar to 7 log CFU/g) was used to contaminate the equipment (similar to 75 L). The system was then emptied of peanut butter and treated with hot oil (90 degrees C) for 2 h followed by sanitizer for 1 h. Microbial analysis of food-contact surfaces (7 locations), peanut butter, and oil were conducted. Oil contained similar to 3.2 log CFU/mL on both trypticase soy agar with yeast extract (TSAYE) and xylose lysine deoxycholate (XLD), indicating hot oil alone was not sufficient to inactivate Salmonella. Environmental sampling found 0.25-1.12 log CFU/cm(2) remaining on processing equipment. After the isopropanol sanitation (+/- quaternary ammonium compounds), no Salmonella was detected in environmental samples on XLD (< 0.16 log CFU/cm(2)). These data suggest that a two-step hot oil clean and isopropanol sanitization treatment may eliminate pathogenic Salmonella from contaminated equipment. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据