4.7 Article

Three-dimensional microscopic assessment of randomly distributed representative volume elements for high fiber volume fraction unidirectional composites

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 192, 期 -, 页码 153-164

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.075

关键词

Representative volume element (RVE); Non-uniform fiber dispersion; Event-driven molecular dynamics simulation (EDMD); Periodic boundary conditions (PBCs); High volume fraction unidirectional composites

资金

  1. University of Waterloo
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. China Scholarship Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Generating realistic non-uniformly distributed three-dimensional representative volume element (RVE) for modeling the response of high fiber volume fraction composites is challenging. A novel rapid approach employing a random event-driven molecular dynamics simulation (EDMD) was proposed in this study for this purpose. Distributions of continuous unidirectional fibers in the RVEs were assessed using two approaches, namely Voronoi tessellations and radial distribution functions. The developed method was highly efficient in generating RVEs with realistic fiber dispersions. Furthermore, applying the corresponding periodic boundary conditions (PBCs) for finite element modeling is also arduous. A technique was developed within the commercial finite element software ABAQUS to rapidly produce required matching mesh patterns on opposite surfaces of the RVE, and to apply the corresponding PBCs using custom scripts. By coupling the EDMD approach and custom scripts within ABAQUS to rapidly generate and mesh RVEs with high fiber volume fractions, evaluation of the RVE response was greatly simplified. In-and out-of-plane elastic properties of unidirectional glass/epoxy composite in a range of 10-80% fiber volume fractions were determined and compared with analytical models, and available experimental data, with good correlation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据