4.7 Article

Three-dimensional finite element modelling of the fire behaviour of insulated RC beams strengthened with EBR and NSM CFRP strips

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 183, 期 -, 页码 124-136

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.01.082

关键词

Reinforced concrete; CFRP strips; EBR (externally bonded reinforcement); NSM (near surface mounted); Fire protection systems; 3D finite element modelling

资金

  1. FCT [PTDC/ECM/1882/2014, SFRH/BPD/99902/2014, SFRH/BPD/108319/2015]
  2. CERIS (Instituto Superior Tecnico, Universidade de Lisboa)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents numerical simulations of the fire behaviour of reinforced concrete (RC) beams flexurally strengthened with carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) strips installed according to the externally bonded reinforcement (EBR) and near surface mounted (NSM) techniques. Three dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) models of the beams were developed, in which the temperature-dependent thermophysical and mechanical properties of the constituent materials was considered. The CFRP-concrete interaction was modelled by means of bi-linear bond-slip laws previously calibrated by the authors for different temperatures. Comparisons between numerical and previous experimental results confirmed the accuracy of the models in predicting the thermo-mechanical response of insulated CFRPstrengthened RC beams exposed to fire. The results obtained highlight the possibility of exploring the CFRP mechanical contribution in fire through a `` cable behaviour by applying a thicker insulation in the CFRP anchorage zones. Moreover, the numerical results confirmed the better fire performance of the NSM strengthening technique when compared to EBR: with the latter technique CFRP debonding occurred after considerably shorter periods of fire exposure and for much lower average temperatures in the adhesive in the anchorage zones, from 1.2 x T-g to 1.4 x T-g, with such range being 2.4 x T-g to 4.2 x T-g for the NSM system. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据