4.7 Article

An experimental study on mechanical response of single-lap bolted CFRP composite interference-fit joints

期刊

COMPOSITE STRUCTURES
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 76-88

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.016

关键词

Composite joints; Mechanical response; Interference-fit size; Tightening torque; Stacking sequence

资金

  1. Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars in Shaanxi Province of China [S2018-JC-JQ-0260]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201606290099]
  3. U.S. Army Research Office (ARO Grant) [W911NF-13-1-0211]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper reports an experimental study on mechanical response of single-lap bolted composite interference-fit joints in their entire life span. Particular focus was given to interface behavior, bearing response, strain distribution and out-of-plane deformation under varying multiple parameters including interference-fit percentage, tightening torque and stacking sequence. The 3D digital image correlation system was used to characterize development of strain concentration and deformation. Microscopy studies on coupled interface and bearing plane were conducted to understand the damage mechanism. It's found that the bolt-inserting can act as cold expansion which facilitates forming tightly coupled interface and prohibits inclination of bolt. The linear phase of stress-strain behavior is prolonged by tightening torque which inhibits delamination growth in bearing plane, induces friction force to balance external load and postpones bolt-to-hole bearing action. The strain around the hole goes through a switch from release of residual pressure on tensile side to squeezing on bearing side. During the switch the interface keeps tightly coupled without delay in load take-up. Strain concentration bands were observed in the joints with highly anisotropic laminates, whereas it is localized around bolt-hole in quasi-isotropic laminates. The joint structure possesses its own response characteristics which are beyond extrapolation from ply properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据