4.5 Review

Effect of Nigella sativa supplementation on obesity indices: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

期刊

COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 48-57

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2018.04.003

关键词

Nigella sativa; Body mass index; Waist circumference; Body weight; Obesity; Meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background & objective(s): No meta-analysis is available on the effect of Nigella sativa (NS) on obesity indices. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to systematically review the available Randomized Clinical Trials (RCTs) that examined the effects of NS on Body Weight (BW), Body Mass index (BMI), and Waist Circumference (WC) in adults. Methods: Relevant articles published up to January 2018 were searched through PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases, using relevant keywords. All RCTs that examined the effect of NS supplementation on BW, BMI, or WC were included. Results: Overall, thirteen RCTs, including 875 subjects (64% males) were included in this study. Combining effect sizes from ten studies, NS supplementation significantly reduced BW (Weighted Mean Differences (WMD): -1.76 kg, 95% CI: -3.34 to -0.17, I-2 = 87.4%), as compared to placebo. Subgroup analysis by the intervention type (I-2 = 0.0%), participants' gender (I-2 = 0.0%), and age (I-2 = 5.5%) removed between-study heterogeneity. A significant reduction was seen in BMI (WMD: -0.85 kg/m(2), 95% CI: -1.23, 0.46, I-2 = 70.6%) after NS supplementation than placebo among eleven trials. Subgroup analysis based on study duration (I-2 = 0.0%), participants' gender (females: I-2 = 0.0% & both genders: I-2 = 20.9%), an age (I-2 = 35.9%) disappeared the heterogeneity. However, no significant reduction was found in WC comparing NS supplementation to placebo (WMD: -4.04 cm, 95% CI: 11.37, 3.27, I-2 = 97.8%) in five studies. Conclusions: We find a significant effect of NS supplementation on BW and BMI in adults. However, the effect of NS supplementation on WC was not significant in this meta-analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据