4.7 Article

Size-dependent effect of cystine/citric acid-capped confeito-like gold nanoparticles on cellular uptake and photothermal cancer therapy

期刊

COLLOIDS AND SURFACES B-BIOINTERFACES
卷 161, 期 -, 页码 365-374

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2017.10.064

关键词

Gold nanoparticles; Cystine; Size; Endocytosis; Intracellular localization; Photothermal cytotoxicity

资金

  1. HIR-MoHE [UM.C/625/1/HIR/MOHE/MED/17, UM.C/625/1/HIR/MOHE/MED/33]
  2. UM postgraduate research grant [PG158-2015B]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Physiochemical changes, including size, are known to affect gold nanoparticle cellular internalization and treatment efficacy. Here, we report the effect of four sizes of cystine/citric acid-coated confeito-like gold nanoparticles (confeito-AuNPs) (30, 60, 80 and 100 nm) on cellular uptake, intracellular localization and photothermal anticancer treatment efficiency in MDA-MB231 breast cancer cells. Cellular uptake is size dependent with the smallest size of confeito-AuNPs (30 nm) having the highest cellular internalization via clathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis. However, the other three sizes (60, 80 and 100 nm) utilize clathrin-mediated endocytosis for cellular uptake. The intracellular localization of confeito-AuNPs is related to their endocytosis mechanism, where all sizes of confeito-AuNPs were localized highly in the lysosome and mitochondria, while confeito-AuNPs (30 nm) gave the highest localization in the endoplasmic reticulum. Similarly, a size-dependent trend was also observed in in vitro photothermal treatment experiments, with the smallest confeito-AuNPs (30 nm) giving the highest cell killing rate, whereas the largest size of confeito-AuNPs (100 nm) displayed the lowest photothermal efficacy. Its desirable physicochemical characteristics, biocompatible nature and better photothermal efficacy will form the basis for further development of multifunctional confeito-AuNP-based nanotherapeutic applications. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据