4.1 Article

Butane Hash Oil Burns Associated with Marijuana Liberalization in Colorado

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL TOXICOLOGY
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 422-425

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13181-015-0501-0

关键词

Bum; Butane hash oil; Colorado; Marijuana; THC

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [K23 GM110516, UL1 TR000154]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Butane hash oil (BHO), also known as amber, dab, glass, honey, shatter, or wax, is a potent marijuana concentrate, containing up to 90 % tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). BHO is easily manufactured using highly volatile butane as a solvent. Our objective was to characterize hydrocarbon bums associated with BHO manufacture in Colorado. This was a cross-sectional study utilizing the National Burn Repository to capture all hydrocarbon bums reported to the local burn center from January 1st, 2008, through August 31st, 2014. We abstracted demographic and clinical variables from medical records for patients admitted for hydrocarbon bums associated with butane hash oil extraction. Twenty-nine cases of BHO bums were admitted to the local bum center during the study period. Zero cases presented prior to medical liberalization, 19 (61.3 %) during medical liberalization (Oct 2009-Dec 2013), and 12 (38.7 %) in 2014 since legalization. The majority of cases were Caucasian (72.4 %) males (89.7 %). Median age was 26 (range 15-58). The median total-body-surface-area (TBSA) bum size was 10 % (TBSA range 1-90 %). Median length of hospital admission was 10 days. Six required intubation for airway protection (21 %). Nineteen required skin grafting, eight wound care only, one required surgical fracture repair, and one required surgical debridement. Hydrocarbon burns associated with hash oil production have increased since the liberalization of marijuana policy in Colorado. A combination of public health messaging, standardization of manufacturing processes, and worker safety regulations are needed to decrease the risks associated with BHO production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据