3.8 Article

The four or more medicines (FOMM) support service: results from an evaluation of a new community pharmacy service aimed at over-65s

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE
卷 23, 期 6, 页码 407-414

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijpp.12196

关键词

adherence; community pharmacy; falls; polypharmacy; quality of life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective Inappropriate prescribing and nonadherence have a significant impact on hospital admissions and patient quality of life. The English government has identified that community pharmacy could make a significant contribution to reducing nonadherence and improving the quality of prescribing, reducing both hospital admissions and medicines wastage. The objective of this study is to evaluate a community pharmacy service aimed at patients over the age of 65 years prescribed four or more medicines. Methods Patients were invited to participate in the service by the community pharmacy team. The pharmacist held regular consultations with the patient and discussed risk of falls, pain management, adherence and general health. They also reviewed the patient's medication using STOPP/START criteria. Data were analysed for the first 6 months of participation in the service. Key findings Six hundred twenty patients were recruited with 441 (71.1%) completing the 6-month study period. Pharmacists made 142 recommendations to prescribers in 110 patients largely centred on potentially inappropriate prescribing of NSAIDs, PPIs or duplication of therapy. At follow-up, there was a significant decrease in the total number of falls(mean-0.116 (-0.217--0.014)) experienced and a significant increase in medicine adherence (mean difference in Morisky Measure of Adherence Scale-8: 0.513 (0.337-0.689)) and quality of life. Cost per quality-adjusted life year estimates ranged from 11 pound 885 to 32 pound 466 depending on the assumptions made. Conclusion By focussing on patients over the age of 65 years with four or more medicines, community pharmacists can improve medicine adherence and patient quality of life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据