4.7 Article

General transformation law of chlorinated acetanilide herbicides by reactive oxidative species (ROSs) during photocatalytic process

期刊

JOURNAL OF WATER PROCESS ENGINEERING
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 E66-E74

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jwpe.2014.11.009

关键词

Chlorinated acetanilide herbicides; Transformation law; Reactive oxidative species (ROSs); Photocatalytic degradation; Mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21207034, 21172064]
  2. Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Hunan [2015JJ3056]
  3. Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department [14K030, 11CY007]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Five chlorinated acetanilide herbicides with similar structure, namely alachlor (Al), acetochlor (Ac), butachlor (Bu), propachlor (Pr) and metolachlor (Me), were selected to explore general laws of the transformation mechanism by reactive oxidative species (ROSs) during photocatalytic process. The degradation kinetics followed the order of Al > Ac > Me > Bu > Pr, and center dot OH was the main active species for causing the degradation of chlorinated acetanilide herbicides. After calculation of frontier electron densities (FEDs), point charges (PCs) and E-a of the proposed degradation intermediates, carbon atom connected to amino group and its para-position on benzene ring were elucidated to take radical reactions with center dot OH easily, while the chlorinated acetanilide and ether side chain were likely to be adsorbed on the catalyst surface and then reacted with photohole at the initial stage. Combination of calculated results and identified degradation intermediates by HPLC and HPLC/MS/MS, three degradation pathways were thereby proposed by ROSs for these five chlorinated acetanilide herbicides, such as the addition of hydroxyl radicals to parent molecules of chlorinated acetanilide herbicides, the left of ether side chain on nitrogen atom and the cleavage of chlorinated acetanilide. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据