4.5 Article

Emotion perception and recognition: An exploration of cultural differences and similarities

期刊

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH
卷 52, 期 -, 页码 103-116

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.06.009

关键词

Time-series analysis; Classification; Electroencephalogram; Emotion recognition Cultural differences

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia [OI174023]
  2. International Cooperative Program, Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission, China [16550720500]
  3. [2-9/2013]
  4. [4-9/2018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electroencephalogram (EEG) is a powerful method for investigation of different cognitive processes. Recently, EEG analysis became very popular and important, with classification of these signals standing out as one of the mostly used methodologies. Emotion recognition is one of the most challenging tasks in EEG analysis since not much is known about the representation of different emotions in EEG signals. In addition, inducing of desired emotion is by itself difficult, since various individuals react differently to external stimuli (audio, video, etc.). In this article, we explore the task of emotion recognition from EEG signals using distance-based time-series classification techniques, involving different individuals exposed to audio stimuli. Furthermore, since some of the participants in the experiment do not understand the language of the stimuli, we also investigate the impact of language understanding on emotion perception. Using time-series distances as features for the construction of new data representations, applied here for the first time to emotion recognition and related tasks, lead to excellent classification performance, indicating that differences between EEG signals can be used to build successful models for recognition of emotions, individuals, and other related tasks. In the process, we observed that cultural differences between the subjects did not have a significant impact on the recognition tasks and models. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据