4.2 Article

The combination of sugammadex and neostigmine can reduce the dosage of sugammadex during recovery from the moderate neuromuscular blockade

期刊

KOREAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY
卷 68, 期 6, 页码 547-555

出版社

KOREAN SOC ANESTHESIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.6.547

关键词

Neostigmine; Neuromuscular blockade; Rocuronium; Sugammadex

资金

  1. Inje University research grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Sugammadex is a novel neuromuscular reversal agent, but its associated hypersensitivity reaction and high cost have been obstacles to its widespread use. In the interest of reducing the necessary dosage of sugammadex, the reversal time of the combined use of sugammadex and neostigmine from moderate neuromuscular blockade were investigated. Methods: The patients enrolled ranged in age from 18 to 65 years old with American Society of Anesthesiologists class 1 or 2. The subjects were randomly assigned into one of the four groups (Group S2, S1, SN, and N; n = 30 per group). The reversal agents of each groups were as follows: S2-sugammadex 2 mg/kg, S1-sugammadex 1 mg/kg, SN-sugammadex 1 mg/kg + neostigmine 50 mu g/kg + glycopyrrolate 10 mu g/kg, N-neostigmine 50 mu g/kg + glycopyrrolate 10 mu g/kg. The time to recovery of the train-of-four (TOF) ratio was checked in each group. Results: The time to 90% recovery of TOF ratio was 182.6 +/- 88.9, 371.1 +/- 210.4, 204.3 +/- 103.2, 953.2 +/- 379.7 sec in group S2, S1, SN and N, respectively. Group SN showed a significantly shorter recovery time than did group S1 and N (P < 0.001). However, statistically significant differences between the S2 and SN groups were not be observed (P = 0.291). No hypersensitivity reactions occurred in all groups. Conclusions: For the reversal from rocuronium-induced moderate neuromuscular blockade, the combined use of sugammadex and neostigmine may be helpful to decrease the recovery time and can also reduce the required dosage of sugammadex. However, the increased incidence of systemic muscarinic side effects must be considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据