4.6 Article

THE ACS LCID PROJECT: ON THE ORIGIN OF DWARF GALAXY TYPES-A MANIFESTATION OF THE HALO ASSEMBLY BIAS?

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS
卷 811, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/811/2/L18

关键词

galaxies: dwarf; galaxies: evolution; galaxies: formation

资金

  1. NWO [639.041.233]
  2. NASA Hubble Fellowship [HST-HF-51331.01]
  3. Spanish MINECO [RYC-2012-11537]
  4. PRIN-MIUR [2010LY5N2T]
  5. [AYA2013-42781]
  6. [AYA2014-56795]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We discuss how knowledge of the whole evolutionary history of dwarf galaxies, including details on the early star formation events, can provide insight on the origin of the different dwarf galaxy types. We suggest that these types may be imprinted by the early conditions of formation rather than only being the result of a recent morphological transformation driven by environmental effects. We present precise star formation histories of a sample of Local Group dwarf galaxies, derived from color-magnitude diagrams reaching the oldest main-sequence turnoffs. We argue that these galaxies can be assigned to two basic types: fast dwarfs that started their evolution with a dominant and short star formation event and slow dwarfs that formed a small fraction of their stars early and have continued forming stars until the present time (or almost). These two different evolutionary paths do not map directly onto the present-day morphology (dwarf spheroidal versus dwarf irregular). Slow and fast dwarfs also differ in their inferred past location relative to the Milky Way and/or M31, which hints that slow dwarfs were generally assembled in lower-density environments than fast dwarfs. We propose that the distinction between a fast and slow dwarf galaxy primarily. reflects the characteristic density of the environment where they form. At a later stage, interaction with a large host galaxy may play a role in the final gas removal and ultimate termination of star formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据