相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Comparison of peri and post-procedural complications in patients undergoing revascularisation of coronary artery multivessel disease by coronary artery bypass grafting or protected percutaneous coronary intervention with the Impella 2.5 device
Tobias Becher et al.
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE (2019)
The effectiveness and safety of the Impella ventricular assist device for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review
Jamal Ait Ichou et al.
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS (2018)
Hemodynamic Support With a Microaxial Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Device (Impella) Protects Against Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Michael P. Flaherty et al.
CIRCULATION RESEARCH (2017)
Description of a Heart Team approach to coronary revascularization and its beneficial long-term effect on clinical events after PCI
Tassilo Bonzel et al.
CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY (2016)
Meta-Analysis of Usefulness of Percutaneous Left Ventricular Assist Devices for High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
Alexandros Briasoulis et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY (2016)
Impella ventricular support in clinical practice: Collaborative viewpoint from a European expert user group
Francesco Burzotta et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY (2015)
An insight into short- and long-term mechanical circulatory support systems
Markus Ferrari et al.
CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY (2015)
Percutaneous Mechanical Ventricular Support in Acute Cardiac Care: A UK Quaternary Centre Experience Using 2.5L, 3.8L and 5.0L Impella Catheters
Vinod Venugopal et al.
CARDIOLOGY AND THERAPY (2015)
Impact of Hemodynamic Support With Impella 2.5 Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump on Prognostically Important Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (from the PROTECT II Randomized Trial)
George D. Dangas et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY (2014)
2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization
Stephan Windecker et al.
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL (2014)
The impella recover 2.5 and TandemHeart ventricular assist devices are safe and associated with equivalent clinical outcomes in patients undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention
Jason C. Kovacic et al.
CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS (2013)
Combination of angiographic and clinical characteristics for the prediction of clinical outcomes in elderly patients undergoing multivessel PCI
Jan-Malte Sinning et al.
CLINICAL RESEARCH IN CARDIOLOGY (2013)
Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II
Vasim Farooq et al.
LANCET (2013)
A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Hemodynamic Support With Impella 2.5 Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Patients Undergoing High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention The PROTECT II Study
William W. O'Neill et al.
CIRCULATION (2012)
Combined impella and intra-aortic balloon pump support to improve both ventricular unloading and coronary blood flow for myocardial recovery: An experimental study
Loes D. C. Sauren et al.
ARTIFICIAL ORGANS (2007)
分享论文
