4.5 Article

Disruption of cyclooxygenase type 2 exacerbates apoptosis and renal damage during obstructive nephropathy

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-RENAL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 309, 期 12, 页码 F1035-F1048

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00253.2015

关键词

unilateral ureteral obstruction; cyclooxygenase-2; apoptosis; oxidative stress

资金

  1. Lundbeck Foundation
  2. Karen Elise Jensens Foundation
  3. Danish Society of Nephrology
  4. AP Moller Foundation
  5. Lundbeck Foundation [R108-2012-10372] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF13OC0006975, NNF13OC0006215] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Renal oxidative stress is increased in response to ureteral obstruction. In vitro, cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 activity contributes to protection against oxidants. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that COX-2 activity counters oxidative stress and apoptosis in an in vivo model of obstructive nephropathy. Renal oxidative stress markers, antioxidant enzymes, and markers of tubular injury, tubular dilation, and apoptosis were investigated in COX-2 knockout (COX-2(-/-)) and wild-type (WT) mice subjected to 3 or 7 days of unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO). In a separate series, WT sham-operated and UUO mice were treated with a selective COX-2 inhibitor, parecoxib. COX-2 increased in response to UUO; the oxidative stress markers 4-hydroxynonenal and nitrotyrosine protein residues increased in kidney tissue with no genotype difference after UUO, whereas the antioxidant enzymes heme oxygenase-1 and SOD2 displayed higher levels in COX-2(-/-) mice. Tubular injury was aggravated by COX-2 deletion, as measured by tubular dilatation, an increase in kidney injury molecule-1, cortical caspase-3 content, and apoptosis index. In conclusion, COX-2 is necessary to protect against tubular injury and apoptosis after UUO but not necessary to protect against oxidative stress. COX-2 is not likely to directly regulate antioxidant enzymes heme oxygenase-1 and SOD in the kidney.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据