4.7 Article

X-RAY REFLECTION SPECTROSCOPY OF THE BLACK HOLE GX 339-4: EXPLORING THE HARD STATE WITH UNPRECEDENTED SENSITIVITY

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 813, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637X/813/2/84

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; atomic processes; black hole physics; line: formation; X-rays: individual (GX 339-4)

资金

  1. NASA [NNX11AD08G, NAS8-03060]
  2. NASA Hubble Fellowship [HST-HF-51315.01]
  3. NASA through the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory (SAO) [SV3-73016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analyze simultaneously six composite RXTE spectra of GX 339-4 in the hard state comprising 77 million counts collected over 196 ks. The source spectra are ordered by luminosity and span the range 1.6%-17% of the Eddington luminosity. Crucially, using our new tool pcacorr, we re-calibrate the data to a precision of 0.1%, an order of magnitude improvement over all earlier work. Using our advanced reflection model relxill, we target the strong features in the component of emission reflected from the disk, namely, the relativistically broadened Fe K emission line, the Fe K edge, and the Compton hump. We report results for two joint fits to the six spectra: For the first fit, we fix the spin parameter to its maximal value (a(*) = 0.998) and allow the inner disk radius R-in to vary. Results include (i) precise measurements of R-in, with evidence that the disk becomes slightly truncated at a few percent of Eddington and (ii) an order-of-magnitude swing with luminosity in the high energy cutoff, which reaches > 890 keV at our lowest luminosity. For the second fit, we make the standard assumption in estimating spin that the inner edge of the accretion disk is located at the innermost stable circular orbit (R-in = RISCO) and find a(*) = 0.95(0.05)(+0.03)(90% confidence, statistical). For both fits, and at the same level of statistical confidence, we estimate that the disk inclination is i = 48 degrees +/- 1 degrees and that the Fe abundance is super-solar, A(Fe) = 5 +/- 1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据