4.7 Review

Management of KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae infections

期刊

CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION
卷 24, 期 2, 页码 133-144

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.08.030

关键词

Antibiotic treatment; ESCMID; Klebsiella pneumoniae; KPC; position paper

资金

  1. Merck
  2. Nordic Pharma
  3. Novartis
  4. Pfizer
  5. Astellas
  6. Angelini ACRAF
  7. AstraZeneca
  8. Basilea
  9. Biologix FZ
  10. Gilead
  11. Tetraphase
  12. Thermo Fisher
  13. Vifor Pharma
  14. Achaogen
  15. Cepheid
  16. Menarini
  17. Rempex/The Medicine Company
  18. Vifor
  19. Accelerate
  20. Alifax
  21. Arrow
  22. Becton-Dickinson
  23. bioMerieux
  24. Biotest
  25. Checkpoints
  26. Elitech
  27. Estor
  28. Liofilchem
  29. VentorX
  30. Zambon
  31. Curetis
  32. AbbVie
  33. Sanofi
  34. FrameWork 7 program HemoSpec
  35. Horizon Marie Curie project European Sepsis Academy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-KP) has become one of the most important contemporary pathogens, especially in endemic areas. Aims: To provide practical suggestion for physicians dealing with the management of KPC-KP infections in critically ill patients, based on expert opinions. Sources: PubMed search for relevant publications related to the management of KPC-KP infections. Contents: A panel of experts developed a list of 12 questions to be addressed. In view of the current lack of high-level evidence, they were asked to provide answers on the bases of their knowledge and experience in the field. The panel identified several key aspects to be addressed when dealing with KPC-KP in critically ill patients (preventing colonization in the patient, preventing infection in the colonized patient and colonization of his or her contacts, reducing mortality in the infected patient by rapidly diagnosing the causative agent and promptly adopting the best therapeutic strategy) and provided related suggestions that were based on the available observational literature and the experience of panel members. Implications: Diagnostic technologies could speed up the diagnosis of KPC-KP infections. Combination treatment should be preferred to monotherapy in cases of severe infections. For nonecritically ill patients without severe infections, results from randomized clinical trials are needed for ultimately weighing benefits and costs of using combinations rather than monotherapy. Multifaceted infection control interventions are needed to decrease the rates of colonization and cross-transmission of KPC-KP. (C) 2017 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据