3.8 Proceedings Paper

A Fast Maximum Likelihood-Based Estimation of a Modal Model

期刊

TOPICS IN MODAL ANALYSIS, VOL 10
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 133-156

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-15251-6_15

关键词

Modal model; Maximum likelihood; Modal parameters; Frequency-domain; Estimator

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, the ML-MM estimator, a multivariable frequency-domain maximum likelihood estimator based on a modal model formulation, will be represented and improved in terms of the computational speed and the memory requirements. Basically, the design requirements to be met in the ML-MM estimator were to have accurate estimate for both of the modal parameters and their confidence limits and, meanwhile, having a clear stabilization chart which enables the user to easily select the physical modes within the selected frequency band. The ML-MM method estimates the modal parameters by directly identifying the modal model instead of identifying a rational fraction polynomial model. In the ML-MM estimator, the confidence bounds on the estimated modal parameters (i.e., frequency, damping ratios, mode shapes, etc.) are derived directly by inverting the so-called Fisher information matrix and without using many linearization formulas that are normally used when identifying rational fraction polynomial-based models. Another advantage of the ML-MM estimator lies in its potential to overcome the difficulties that the classical modal parameter estimation methods face when fitting an FRF matrix that consists of many (i.e., 4 or more) columns, i.e., in cases where many input excitation locations have to be used in the modal testing. For instance, the high damping level in acoustic modal analysis requires many excitation locations to get sufficient excitation of the modes. In this contribution, the improved ML-MM estimator will be validated and compared with some other classical modal parameter estimation methods using simulated datasets and real industrial applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据