4.3 Review

Breast Lesions: Diagnosis Using Diffusion Weighted Imaging at 1.5T and 3.0T-Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

期刊

CLINICAL BREAST CANCER
卷 18, 期 3, 页码 E305-E320

出版社

CIG MEDIA GROUP, LP
DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.06.011

关键词

1.5T; 3.0T; Breast DWI; Breast lesions; DWI

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81401403]
  2. Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical Engineering cross fund [YG2014MS48]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of DWI acquired with 1.5T and 3.0T MRI in differentiating malignant breast lesions from benign ones. A comprehensive search was performed on articles published from January 2000 to February 2016. For the 44 studies used 1.5T MR and 17 studies used 3.0T MR, the comparison suggested that the diagnostic accuracy was not significantly different. Introduction: We compared the diagnostic performance of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) acquired with 1.5T and 3.0T magnetic resonance (MR) units in differentiating malignant breast lesions from benign ones. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search of the PubMed and Embase databases was performed for studies reported from January 1, 2000 to February 19, 2016. The quality of the included studies was assessed. Statistical analysis included pooling of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity and assessing data inhomogeneity and publication bias. Results: A total of 61 studies were included after a full-text review. These included 4778 patients and 5205 breast lesions. The overall sensitivity and specificity were 90% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88%-92%) and 86% (95% CI, 82%-89%), respectively. The pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 53 (95% CI, 37-74). For breast cancer versus benign lesions, the area under the curve was 0.94 (95% CI, 0.92-0.96). For the 44 studies that used a 1.5T MR unit, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 91% (95% CI, 89%-92%) and 86% (95% CI, 81%-90%), respectively. For the 17 studies that used a 3.0T MR unit, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 88% (95% CI, 83%-91%) and 84% (95% CI, 0.78-0.89), respectively. Publication bias and significant heterogeneity were observed; however, no threshold was found among the 61 studies. No significant difference was found in the sensitivity or specificity between the subgroups. Conclusion: The results of the comparison between the subgroups that had used either a 1.5T or 3.0T MR unit suggest that the diagnostic accuracy for breast cancer compared with benign lesions is not significantly different. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据