4.3 Article

Accelerations from wearable accelerometers reflect knee loading during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

期刊

CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
卷 58, 期 -, 页码 57-61

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.07.007

关键词

Wearable accelerometers; Anterior cruciate ligament; Rehabilitation; Knee; Accelerometer; Power

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, individuals exhibit sagittal plane knee loading deficits as they underload their injured limb during running. These between-limb biomechanical differences are difficult to clinically detect. Wearable accelerometers may aid in the development of early rehabilitation programs to improve symmetrical loading. This study aimed to identify whether segment accelerations from wearable accelerometers can predict knee loading asymmetry in an anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed population. Methods: 14 individuals 5-months post-anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction performed self-selected speed running. Data were collected concurrently using a marker-based motion system and accelerometers positioned on participants' shanks and thighs. Stepwise linear regression was used to determine predictive value of accelerometer data on biomechanical variables. Finding: Shank acceleration was not predictive of any biomechanical variable. Between-limb differences in thigh axial acceleration explained 30% of the variance in between-limb differences in knee power absorption (p = 0.045), suggesting that accelerometers placed on proximal joint segments may provide information regarding knee loading asymmetry. Between-limb differences in thigh axial acceleration also explained 38% of the variance in between-limb differences in ground reaction force (p = 0.002). Interpretation: These relationships indicate that accelerations from wearable accelerometers may provide some useful information regarding knee loading during running in individuals following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据