4.3 Article

Effects of supplemental heat therapy in multimodal treated chronic low back pain patients on strength and flexibility

期刊

CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
卷 57, 期 -, 页码 107-113

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.06.008

关键词

Low back pain; Thermotherapy; Heat wrap; Multimodal treatment; Strength; Flexibility

资金

  1. PFIZER Consumer Healthcare GmbH, Berlin, Germany [WS1875800]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The beneficial effects of thermotherapy on analgesia and relaxation are widely known for various diseases. To date, however, thermotherapy in chronic low back pain is not explicitly recommended in international guidelines. The effects of thermotherapy on biomechanical parameters within a multimodal back pain treatment concept are also unknown. Methods: Within a multimodal treatment concept, 176 patients with chronic low back pain were treated either with or without supplemental heat wrap therapy. The range of movement and strength parameters of the trunk in flexion, extension, lateral flexion and rotation were measured before and after 12 weeks of treatment. Findings: The range of movement as well as strength parameters of the trunk improved on average within the multimodal treatment. Patients receiving additional thermotherapy supplemental to basic multimodal treatment showed a further improvement of strength parameters regarding extension (P = 0.09, 1 - beta = 0.41), rotation to the right (P = 0.09, 1 - beta = 0.41) and rotation to the left (P = 0.08, 1 - beta = 0.42) in comparison to those conducting only the multimodal treatment. No group differences were detected in flexibility. Interpretation The implementation of thermotherapy for several hours a day (heat wrap therapy) in daily clinical practice additional to an individualized, evidence-based multimodal treatment concept can be recommended to enhance strength parameters. The potential causes of improved strength parameters as well as the meaning for the patients in activity of daily living are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据