4.7 Article

Therapeutic drug monitoring of piperacillin and tazobactam by RP-HPLC of residual blood specimens

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 482, 期 -, 页码 60-64

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2018.03.021

关键词

Piperacillin; Tazobactam; High pressure liquid chromatography; Pharmacokinetics; Sepsis; Critical care

资金

  1. NIH [R21DK088045]
  2. Baxter Healthcare Clinical Evidence Council for Renal Acute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Sepsis is a common diagnosis in critical care with inpatient mortality rates up to 50%. Sepsis care is organized around source control, antibiotics, and supportive care. Drug disposition is deranged by changes in volume of distribution and regional blood flow, as well as multiple organ failure. Thus, assuring that each patient with sepsis attains pharmacokinetic targets is challenging. There is currently no commercially available FDA approved assay to measure piperacillin-tazobactam, very commonly used as a beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotic in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: Samples were prepared by ultrafiltration of plasma collected in lithium heparin Vacutainers. Separation was achieved by gradient elution on a C-18 column followed by UV detection at 214 nm. The method is validated in residual blood samples allowing investigators to exploit a waste product to develop insight into beta-lactam pharmacokinetics in the ICU. Results: Accuracy and precision were within the 25% CLIA error standard for other antibiotic assays. Free piperacillin concentrations were also in good agreement with total piperacillin concentrations measured in the same plasma by an assay in clinical use outside the United States. Conclusion: We describe a method for measuring piperacillin and tazobactam that meets clinical validation standards. Quick turnaround time and excellent accuracy on a low-cost platform make this method more than adequate for use as a routine therapeutic drug monitoring tool.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据