4.7 Article

Serum anti-PLA2R antibody as a diagnostic biomarker of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: The optimal cut-off value for Chinese patients

期刊

CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 476, 期 -, 页码 9-14

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2017.11.006

关键词

Idiopathic membranous nephropathy; Anti-PLA2R antibody; ELISA; Cut-off value

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [81500555]
  2. Third Project of Jinan City Science and Technology Development Plan [201503002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The M-type phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) is a specific target autoantigen identified in idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). The autoantibody against PLA2R (anti-PLA2R) may be used to diagnose IMN. However, the appropriate diagnosis cut-off value for Chinese patients with IMN has not been established. Methods: In total, 119 patients who underwent renal biopsy (57 patients with IMN and 62 patients with non-IMN glomerulonephritis) and 22 healthy individuals were recruited for our observation study from Qianfoshan Hospital between September 2011 and March 2016. The serum concentration of anti-PLA2R was measured using a quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of anti-PLA2R in diagnosing IMN were analysed based on the ELISA detection. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of anti-PLA2R in the diagnosis of IMN in the Chinese patients were 82.5, 75, 69.1, and 86.3% for the 2 RU/ml cut-off value; 78.9, 91.7, 86.5, and 86.5% for the 2.6 RU/ml cutoff value; 59.6, 95.2, 89.5, and 77.7% for the 14 RU/ml cut-off value; 50.9, 96.4, 90.6, and 74.3% for the 20 RU/ml cut-off value; and 47.4, 97.6, 93.1, and 73.2% for the 40 RU/ml cut-off value, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.879. Conclusions: The cut-off value of 2.6 RU/ml is recommended for the use of anti-PLA2R for the diagnosis of IMN in Chinese patients based on the ELISA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据