4.5 Article

Political orientation and climate concern shape visual attention to climate change

期刊

CLIMATIC CHANGE
卷 147, 期 3-4, 页码 383-394

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-018-2147-9

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSERC Discovery grants [RGPIN-2014-04202, RGPIN-2014-05617]
  2. Leaders Opportunity Fund from the Canadian Foundation for Innovation [32102]
  3. Canadian Institutes for Health Research New Investigator Award
  4. Canada Research Chairs Program
  5. SSHRC Postdoctoral Fellowship [756-2016-0829]
  6. SSHRC Insight Development Grant [430-2016-00031]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite the scientific consensus, there is widespread public controversy about climate change. Previous explanations focused on interpretations hampered by political bias or insufficient knowledge of climate facts. We propose that public views of climate change may also be related to an attentional bias at a more basic level of cognitive processing. We hypothesized that selective visual attention towards or away from climate-related information would be associated with climate concern. To test prioritization of climate-related stimuli under conditions of limited attention, we asked participants to identify climate-related and neutral words within a rapid stream of stimuli. Undergraduate students attended to climate-related words more readily than neutral words. This attentional prioritization correlated with self-rated climate concern. We then examined this relationship in a more diverse community sample. Principal component analysis of survey data in the community sample revealed a component indexing a relationship between climate concern and political orientation. That component was correlated with the degree of selective inattention to climate-related words. Our findings suggest that climate-related communications may be most effective if tailored in a manner accounting for how attentional priorities differ between audiences-particularly those with different political orientations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据