4.6 Article

On the link between the subseasonal evolution of the North Atlantic Oscillation and East Asian climate

期刊

CLIMATE DYNAMICS
卷 51, 期 9-10, 页码 3537-3557

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00382-018-4095-5

关键词

North Atlantic Oscillation; East Asian monsoon; Teleconnections; Precipitation; Extended empirical orthogonal functions

资金

  1. Department of Meteorology of Stockholm University
  2. Vetenskapsradet [2016-03724_VR]
  3. UK-China Research and Innovation Partnership Fund through Met Office Climate Science for Service Partnership (CSSP) China as part of the Newton Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We analyse the impact of the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) on the climate of East Asia at subseasonal time scales during both winter and summer. These teleconections have mainly been investigated at seasonal and longer time scales, while higher-frequency links are largely unexplored. The NAO is defined using extended empirical orthogonal functions on pentad-mean observations, which allows to elucidate the oscillation's spatial and temporal evolution and clearly separate the development and decay phases. The downstream dynamical imprint and associated temperature and precipitation anomalies are quantified by means of a linear regression analysis. It is shown that the NAO generates a significant climate response over East Asia during both the dry and wet seasons, whose spatial pattern is highly dependent on the phase of the NAO's life cycle. Temperature and precipitation anomalies develop concurrently with the NAO mature phase, and reach maximum amplitude 5-10 days later. These are shown to be systematically related to mid and high-latitude teleconnections across the Eurasian continent via eastward-propagating quasi-stationary Rossby waves instigated over the Atlantic and terminating in the northeastern Pacific. These findings underscore the importance of rapidly evolving dynamical processes in governing the NAO's downstream impacts and teleconnections with East Asia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据