4.1 Article

Microbiological and physical-chemical characteristics of honeys from the bee Melipona fasciculata produced in two regions of Brazil

期刊

CIENCIA RURAL
卷 48, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

UNIV FEDERAL SANTA MARIA
DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20180025

关键词

Melipona fasciculata; honey; Munim; Pericuma; Brazil; microbiological characteristics; physical-chemical properties; quality standard

类别

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior (CAPES) [20130030]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico do Maranhao (FAPEMA) [03630/2013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The honey from Tiuba bees (Melipona fasciculata) is commercially important in the Brazilian state of Maranhao. However the absence of any specific legislation for this kind of honey is an obstacle to its increased production and commercialization. Determining the microbiological and physical-chemical characteristics of different Tiuba honey can inform the elaboration of specific legislation. Thus, honey samples from two Water Catchment Areas in Maranhao (Munim and Pericuma, sample size 20 for each) were collected and submitted for microbiological analysis (total coliforms, thermotolerant coliforms, molds and yeasts, Clostridium sulfite reducers and Salmonella sp.) and physical-chemical analysis (moisture content, reducing and non-reducing sugars, insoluble and soluble solids, ash content, acidity and pH). Most of honeys sampled were suitable for human consumption, except for one sample from Pericuma. Honeys from the two water catchment areas presented differences in some physicochemical characteristics, which can be attributed to the botanic, soil and climatic diversity of the two areas. Still, these Tiuba honey samples did not fall within the Brazilian legislation for Apis mellifera honey for some of the physical-chemical characteristics, and so is not properly regulated, thus reinforcing the need for specific legislation for this type of honey.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据