4.5 Article

Thermonuclear 19F(p,α0)16O reaction rate

期刊

CHINESE PHYSICS C
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

CHINESE PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1088/1674-1137/42/1/015001

关键词

asymptotic giant branch (AGB) star; nucleosynthesis; astrophysical S factor; cross section; reaction rate

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11490562, 11490560, 11675229]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0400503]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The thermonuclear F-19(p,0)O-16 reaction rate in the temperature region 0.007-10 GK has been derived by re-evaluating the availa alpha(b)le experimental data, together with the low-energy theoretical R-matrix extrapolations. Our new rate deviates by up to about 30% compared to the previous results, although all rates are consistent within the uncertainties. At very low temperature (e.g. 0.01 GK) our reaction rate is about 20% lower than the most recently published rate, because of a difference in the low energy extrapolated S-factor and a more accurate estimate of the reduced mass used in the calculation of the reaction rate. At temperatures above similar to 1 GK, our rate is lower, for instance, by about 20% around 1.75 GK, because we have re-evaluated the previous data (Isoya et al., Nucl. Phys. 7, 116 (1958)) in a meticulous way. The present interpretation is supported by the direct experimental data. The uncertainties of the present evaluated rate are estimated to be about 20% in the temperature region below 0.2 GK, and are mainly caused by the lack of low-energy experimental data and the large uncertainties in the existing data. Asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars evolve at temperatures below 0.2 GK, where the F-19(p,alpha.)O-16 reaction may play a very important role. However, the current accuracy of the reaction rate is insufficient to help to describe, in a careful way, the fluorine over-abundances observed in AGB stars. Precise cross section (or S factor) data in the low energy region are therefore needed for astrophysical nucleosynthesis studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据