4.8 Article

Oxidatively-Stable Linear Poly(propylenimine)-Containing Adsorbents for CO2 Capture from Ultradilute Streams

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 11, 期 15, 页码 2628-2637

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201800438

关键词

adsorption; amines; carbon storage; mesoporous materials; polymers

资金

  1. UNCAGE-ME, an Energy Frontier Research Center by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0012577]
  2. Global Thermostat, LLC
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0012577] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aminopolymer-based solid sorbents have been widely investigated for the capture of CO2 from dilute streams such as flue gas or ambient air. However, the oxidative stability of the widely studied aminopolymer, poly(ethylenimine) (PEI), is limited, causing it to lose its CO2 capture capacity after exposure to oxygen at elevated temperatures. Here, we demonstrate the use of linear poly(propylenimine) (PPI), synthesized through a simple cationic ring-opening polymerization, as a more oxidatively stable alternative to PEI with high CO2 capacity and amine efficiency. The performance of linear PPI/SBA-15 composites was investigated over a range of CO2 capture conditions (CO2 partial pressure, adsorption temperature) to examine the tradeoff between adsorption capacity and sorption-site accessibility, which was expected to be more limited in linear polymers relative to the prototypical hyperbranched PEI. Linear PPI/SBA-15 composites were more efficient at CO2 capture and retained 65-83% of their CO2 capacity after exposure to a harsh oxidative treatment, compared to 20-40% retention for linear PEI. Additionally, we demonstrated long-term stability of linear PPI sorbents over 50 adsorption/desorption cycles with no loss in performance. Combined with other strategies for improving the oxidative stability and adsorption kinetics, linear PPI may play a role as a component of stable solid adsorbents in commercial applications for CO2 capture.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据