4.7 Article

Enhanced degradation of ibuprofen by heterogeneous electro-Fenton at circumneutral pH

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 209, 期 -, 页码 998-1006

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.164

关键词

Heterogeneous electro-Fenton; Ibuprofen; Activated carbon fibers; Ferric citrate

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFE0102000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41672236]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M620801]
  4. Tsinghua University Initiative Scientific Research Program [20151080353]
  5. Thousand Talents Plan for Young Professionals
  6. Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program by CAST [2015QNRC001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fenton based reactions are effective for pharmaceutical removals, but traditional Fenton processes have drawbacks of pH adjustment and large amount of produced iron sludge. To overcome these challenges, a heterogeneous electro-Fenton process was proposed for effective contaminant degradation at circumneutral pH without iron sludge production. The anti-inflammatory drug ibuprofen (a common pharmaceutical in natural waters) was used as a representative contaminant. Activated carbon fibers (ACFs) supported ferric citrate (Cit-Fe/ACFs) was synthesized and used as the cathode, and RuO2/Ti was used as the anode. H(2)O(2 )was electro-generated in situ from O-2 reduction and the production rate of center dot OH per unit area was 6.8 mu M W(-1 )cm(-2) using Cit-Fe/ACFs cathode. A maximal ibuprofen degradation of 97% was obtained after 120 min at the current density of 7 mA cm(-2). The electrical energy per order (E-EO) varied from 0.24 +/- 0.03 to 2.65 +/- 0.04 kWh log(-1) m(-3) when the current density ranged from 1 to 7 mA cm(-2). The Cit-Fe/ACFs cathode showed relatively good reusability and similar to 85% IBP removal was achieved after 6 cycles of degradation. Our results showed that the prepared Cit-Fe/ACFs cathode was promising for the treatment of pharmaceutical contaminants. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据