4.7 Article

Arsenic removal by As-hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata from two contaminated soils: A 5-year study

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 206, 期 -, 页码 736-741

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.055

关键词

Phytoextraction; Phosphate rock; Remediation; Fractionation; Sequential extraction; Metals

资金

  1. University of Florida
  2. Hinkley Center for Solid and Hazardous Waste Management
  3. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [246758/2012-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ability of As-hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata to remove As from two contaminated soils (CCA from an As-treated wood facility and DVA from a cattle-dipping vat) over 5 years was investigated for the first time. The goal was to evaluate P. vittata's ability to continuously remove As during 10 harvests and identify how soil As was affected by P. vittata under P-sufficient (P-fertilizer) and P-limiting (phosphate rock) conditions. Sequential extraction was used to determine changes in metal distribution among different soil fractions. The high frond biomass production occurred on the 9th (62.1-63.9 and 35.6-63.5 g plant(-1)) and 10th harvest (58.6-60.7 and 51.9-57.1 g plant(-1)) for CCA and DVB soils, though frond As concentration decreased. Soil arsenic removal averaged 7-10% per harvest during the 1-6th harvests and was reduced to 0-3% during the 7-10th harvests for DVA and CCA soils. Arsenic from all fractions, excluding the residual fraction, was affected by plant uptake. The largest reduction occurred in the amorphous fraction of CCA-soil at 64-66% (61.2-61.5 to 20.8-21.8 mg kg(-1)) and in the crystalline fraction of DVA-soil at 50-86% (2.18-4.35 to 0.61-1.10 mg kg(-1)). Soil As concentrations were reduced by 37-47% from 26.7 to 129 to 15.6-16.8 and 68.9-70.1 mg kg(-1) for the DVA and CCA soils, respectively. Our data indicated that P. vittata efficiently solubilized non-labile As under P-limiting conditions without impacting its As depletion. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据