4.7 Article

Spatial variation of PCDD/F and PCB emissions and their composition profiles in stack flue gas from the typical cement plants in China

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 491-497

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.114

关键词

Cement kiln; Dioxin; Polychlorinated biphenyls; Emission factor; Profiles

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2015CB453100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21577140]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cement production processes are important sources of unintentionally produced persistent organic pollutants (UP-POPs), such as polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs), and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The emissions of PCDD/Fs and PCBs in the stack flue gases from eight typical cement plants in China were investigated in this study, including one wet process rotary kiln, three dry process rotary kilns and four vertical shaft kilns. PCBs exhibited relatively higher mass concentrations with the dioxin-like (dl) and indicator PCBs of 0.14-17.36 and 0.42-12.90 ng/Nm(3), respectively. However, PCDD/Fs contributed most to the total toxic equivalent concentrations, with the proportions exceeding 90%. The international toxicity equivalency (I-TEQ) concentrations of PCDD/Fs varied greatly from 0.01 to 0.46 ng I-TEQ/Nm(3) in stack gases, two of which exceeded the exhaust gas concentration limit of 0.1 ng I-TEQ/Nm(3) established by the European Union Directive. In weight units, 1,2,3,4,6,7,8-HpCDF was the most abundant congener in the stack gases from various types of cement kilns, with the factions of 17.0-27.8%. TCDFs and PeCDFs were the first two most abundant homologue groups. 2,3,4,7,8-PeCDF was the largest contributor to the total I-TEQ. The emission factors of PCDD/Fs and PCBs in the eight cement kilns were estimated to be 0.01-1.35 mu g I-TEQ/t clinker and 8.20 x 10(-4)-8.23 x 10(-2) mu g World Health Organization TEQ (W-TEQ)/t clinker, respectively. No obvious differences of the PCDD/F and PCB emission factors were found among the varied cement production technologies. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据