4.7 Article

Proteomic profile and toxicity pathway analysis in zebrafish embryos exposed to bisphenol A and di-n-butyl phthalate at environmentally relevant levels

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 193, 期 -, 页码 313-320

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.042

关键词

Proteomics; Toxicity pathway; Endocrine-disrupting chemicals; Bisphenol A; Di-n-butyl phthalate; Zebrafish

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21407066, 31470554]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20130488]
  3. Research Foundation for Advanced Talents of Jiangsu University [13JDG014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bisphenol A (BPA) and di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) are well-known endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) that have human health risks. Chronic exposure to BPA and DBP increases the occurrence of human disease. Despite the potential for exposure in embryonic development, the mechanism of action of BPA and DBP on vertebrate development and disease still remains unclear. In the present study, we identified proteins and protein networks that are perturbed by BPA and DBP during zebrafish (Danio rerio) development. Zebrafish embryos were exposed to environmentally relevant levels of BPA (10 mu g/L) and DBP (50 mu g/L) for 96 h. By iTRAQ labeling quantitative proteomics, a set of 26 and 41 differentially expressed proteins were identified in BPA- and DBP-treated zebrafish embryos, respectively. Integrated toxicity analysis predicted that these proteins function in common regulatory networks that are significantly associated with developmental and metabolic disorders. Exposure to low concentrations of BPA and DBP has potential health risks in zebrafish embryos. Our results also show that BPA and DBP significantly up-regulate the expression levels of multiple network proteins, providing valuable information about the molecular actions of BPA and DBP on the developmental systems. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据