4.7 Article

Effect of the electronegativity on the electrosorption selectivity of anions during capacitive deionization

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 195, 期 -, 页码 282-290

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.031

关键词

Capacitive deionization; Electronegativity; Electrosorption; Selectivity; Desalination

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51304251]
  2. Special Program on Environmental Protection for Public Welfare [201509050]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of electronegativity on the electrosorption selectivity of anions during capacitive deionization was investigated via a combination of experimental and theoretical studies. A model was developed based on chemical thermodynamics and the classic Stern's model to reveal the role of the anode potential and to describe electrosorption selectivity behavior during capacitive deionization. The effects of the anode potential on the adsorption of Cl- and ReO4- were studied and the obtained data were used to validate the model. Using the validated model, the effects of the anode potential and electronegativity of various anions, including Cl-, ReO4-, SO42- and NO3- were assessed. The experimental results for the electrosorption of Cl- and ReO4- corresponded well with the developed model. The electrosorption capacity demonstrates a logarithmic relationship with the anode potential. The model showed that the electronegativity significantly affects the selectivity. In a mixed Cl-, ReO4-, SO42- and NO3- solution, ReO4- was preferentially adsorbed over the other three anions, and the following selectivity was exhibited: ReO4- > NO3- > Cl- > SO42-. The results showed that the effect of flow rates on the electrosorption selectivity can be considered negligible when the flow rates are higher than 112 mL min(-1). The anions selectivity can be further enhanced by increasing the anode potential, and electrosorption selectivity is no appreciable decline after 6 experiments. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据