4.7 Article

Chlorine levels and species in fine and size resolved atmospheric particles by X-ray absorption near-edge structure spectroscopy analysis in Beijing, China

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 393-401

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.126

关键词

Chlorine species; Fine atmospheric particles; X-ray absorption near edge structure; (XANES) spectroscopy; Size distribution; Beijing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11375212, 11435002, 21407149, 11575210, 91643206]
  2. Institute of High Energy Physics [Y7545110U2]
  3. Key Deployment Projects, Chinese Academy of Sciences [ZDRW-CN-2018-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An understanding of the species of chlorine is crucial in the metropolis-Beijing, which is suffering serious haze pollution with high frequency. Particulate Matters (PMs) with five different sizes were collected in Beijing from July 2009 to March 2016, and characterized non-destructively by X-ray absorption near edge structure spectroscopy. PM<0.2, PM0.2-0.5 and PM>2.5 contributed for the major PMs mass in spring and summer, PM0.5-1.0 and PM1.0-25 contributed for the major PMs mass in autumn and winter. The concentrations of the three chlorine species were in the order of inorganic chlorine (Cl-inorg) > aliphatic chlorine (Cl-ali) > aromatic chlorine (Cl-aro), indicating that Cl-inorg constituted the primary chlorine fraction and less toxic Cl-ali constituted the primary total organic chlorine (Cl-ali + Cl-aro, abbreviated as Cl-org) in the PMs in Beijing. In addition, these three chlorine species exhibited identical seasonal variation in PM2.5: winter > autumn> spring > summer. Wet precipitation is an important factor to result in the lower mass concentrations of these three chlorine species in summer. The temporal variations of both size resolved PM mass concentrations and chlorine species concentrations suggested that the air pollution prevention and control in Beijing has just won initial success. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据