4.7 Article

Effect of Skin Wine Pomace and Sulfite on Protein Oxidation in Beef Patties During High Oxygen Atmosphere Storage

期刊

FOOD AND BIOPROCESS TECHNOLOGY
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 532-542

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11947-015-1649-y

关键词

Beef patties; Protein oxidation; Protein radicals; Sulfite; Wine pomace; Protein cross-linking

资金

  1. Autonomous Government of Castilla y Leon [BU268A11-2, BU282U13]
  2. Danish Council for Independent Research \ Technology and Production within the Danish Agency for Science Technology and Innovation [11-117033]
  3. Ministerio de Educacion, Cultura y Deporte of the Spanish Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Meat storage in high oxygen atmosphere has been reported to induce protein oxidation reactions decreasing meat quality. The incorporation of antioxidants has been proposed to reduce the extent of these reactions. In this study, the ability of red and white skin wine pomaces as well as sulfites to inhibit protein oxidation were tested in beef patties stored for up to 15 days at 4 A degrees C in a high oxygen atmosphere (70 % O-2 and 30 % CO2). SO2 (300 ppm) effectively protected against protein oxidation measured as radical formation by electron spin resonance (ESR) spectroscopy, as thiol loss by the DTNB assay and as myosin heavy chain (MHC) disulfide cross-linking by SDS-PAGE. Pomace from red wine production with a total phenol of 9.9 mg gallic acid equivalent/g protected against protein radical formation and against MHC cross-linking, but not against thiol loss by addition of 2.0 % (w/w) to the beef patties. Pomace from white wine production with a total phenol of 4.0 mg gallic acid equivalent/g only protected against MHC cross-linking. For both types of wine pomace, protein modifications not seen for sulfite addition were observed and were proposed to involve covalent phenol addition to proteins. Red wine pomace may be an alternative to sulfite as a meat additive for protection of beef patties against protein oxidation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据