4.6 Review

Photothermal Heating and Cooling of Nanostructures

期刊

CHEMISTRY-AN ASIAN JOURNAL
卷 13, 期 18, 页码 2575-2586

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/asia.201800251

关键词

anti-stokes; cold Brownian motion; heat transfer; laser cooling; photothermal heating

资金

  1. NSF-CAREER Award [1555007]
  2. MURI:MARBLe project under AFOSR [FA9550-16-1-0362]
  3. US Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL)
  4. PNNL's Materials Synthesis and Simulation Across Scales (MS3) Initiative, a Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program at the PNNL
  5. Department of Defense through a National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship (NDSEG) program
  6. Division Of Materials Research
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1555007] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A vast range of insulating, semiconducting, and metallic nanomaterials have been studied over the past several decades with the aim of understanding how continuous-wave or pulsed laser radiation can influence their chemical functionality and local environment. Many fascinating observations have been made during laser irradiation including, but not limited to, the superheating of solvents, mass-transport-mediated morphology evolution, photodynamic therapy, morphology dependent resonances, and a range of phase transformations. In addition to laser heating, recent experiments have demonstrated the laser cooling of nanoscale materials through the emission of upconverted, anti-Stokes photons by trivalent rare-earth ions. This Focus Review outlines the analytical modeling of photothermal heat transport with an emphasis on the experimental validation of anti-Stokes laser cooling. This general methodology can be applied to a wide range of photothermal applications, including nanomedicine, photocatalysis, and the synthesis of new materials. The review concludes with an overview of recent advances and future directions for anti-Stokes cooling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据