4.8 Article

Liquid Phase Acoustic Wave Exfoliation of Layered MoS2: Critical Impact of Electric Field in Efficiency

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 16, 页码 5593-5601

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01506

关键词

-

资金

  1. RMIT Vice-Chancellor's Research Fellowship
  2. Australian Research Council [FT130100672]
  3. ARC Centre of Excellence in Future Low-Energy Electronics Technologies (FLEET) [CE170100039]
  4. Australian Research Council [FT130100672] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liquid phase exfoliation techniques of layered crystals establish the basis for high yield production of two-dimensional (2D) flakes suspension. However, such techniques generally require a long processing time. The recent demonstration of the piezoelectric phenomenon in noncentrosymmetric layered transition metal dichalcogenides, such as molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), leads to new opportunities for fast and efficient exfoliation processes. Here we use concomitant electric field and mechanical shear force for producing a suspension of MoS2 nanoflakes from exfoliation of their layered bulk powder particles. The electrical and mechanical fields are applied by a surface acoustic wave (SAW) microcentrifugation device. We show that the overall yield per unit of time of 3.816%/h can be achieved, which is at least an order of magnitude larger than previously reported liquid phase exfoliation methods. Simultaneously, the impressive monolayer yield is 58% in an excellent agreement with the computational estimation based on electric field assisted density functional theory calculations. The work therefore reports two major advancements. We show efficient exfoliation of layered MoS2. More importantly, we demonstrate the importance of the electric field in increasing the efficiency of liquid phase exfoliation. It is thus expected that these outcomes to fundamentally impact research activities focused on the exfoliation of piezoelectric 2D materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据