4.8 Article

Efficient Capture of Perrhenate and Pertechnetate by a Mesoporous Zr Metal-Organic Framework and Examination of Anion Binding Motifs

期刊

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 4, 页码 1277-1284

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b04619

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0003763]
  2. NASA Ames Research Center [NNA06CB93G]
  3. Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) Resource [NSF NNCI-1542205]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21422704, 11605118]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

At the Hanford Site in southeastern Washington state, the U.S. Department of Energy intends to treat 56 million gallons of legacy nuclear waste by encasing it in borosilicate glass via vitrification. This process ineffectively captures radioactive pertechnetate (TcO4-) because of the ion's volatility, thereby requiring a different remediation method for this long-lived (t(1/2) = 2.1 x 10(5) years), environmentally mobile species. Currently available sorbents lack the desired combination of high uptake capacity, fast kinetics, and selectivity. Here, we evaluate the ability of the chemically and thermally robust Zr-6-based metal organic framework (MOF), NU-1000, to capture perrhenate (ReO4-), a pertechnetate simulant, and pertechnetate. Our material exhibits an excellent perrhenate uptake capacity of 210 mg/g, reaches saturation within 5 min, and maintains perrhenate uptake in the presence of competing anions. Additionally, experiments with pertechnetate confirm perrhenate is a suitable surrogate. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction indicates both chelating and nonchelating perrhenate binding motifs are present in both the small pore and the mesopore of NU-1000. Postadsorption diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy (DRIFTS) further elucidates the uptake mechanism and powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area analysis confirm the retention of crystallinity and porosity of NU-1000 throughout adsorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据